000			03558nam a22004695i 4500
001			978-1-4020-4209-6
003			DE-He213
005			20260521092105.0
007			cr nn 008mamaa
008			100301s2006 ne | s |||| 0|eng d
020			_a9781402042096
020			_a99781402042096
024	7		_a10.1007/1-4020-4209-4 _2doi
082	0	4	_a340.1 _223
100	1		_aCASALS, NEUS TORBISCO. _eeditor.
245	1	0	_aGroup Rights as Human Rights _h[electronic resource] / _cedited by NEUS TORBISCO CASALS.
264		1	_aDordrecht : _bSpringer Netherlands, _c2006.
300			_aXV, 263 p. _bonline resource.
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
347			_atext file _bPDF _2rda
490	1		_aLaw and Philosophy Library, _x1572-4395 ; _v75
505	0		_aCultural Minorities and Group Rights: Contested Concepts -- Towards an Alternative Notion of Group Rights -- Understanding Multiculturalism: Which Groups Qualify -- Tolerance, Neutrality and Group Rights -- On the Relevance of Cultural Belonging: Group Rights as Instrumental Rights and as Fundamental Rights -- Multiculturalism, Ethnic Minorities and the Limits of Cultural Diversity.
520			_aLiberal theories have long insisted that cultural diversity in democratic societies can be accommodated through classical liberal tools, in particular through individual rights, and they have often rejected the claims of cultural minorities for group rights as illiberal. Group Rights as Human Rights argues that such a rejection is misguided. Based on a thorough analysis of the concept of group rights, it proposes to overcome the dominant dichotomy between "individual" human rights and "collective" group rights by recognizing that group rights also serve individual interests. It also challenges the claim that group rights, so understood, conflict with the liberal principle of neutrality; on the contrary, these rights help realize the neutrality ideal as they counter cultural biases that exist in Western states. Group rights deserve to be classified as human rights because they respond to fundamental, and morally important, human interests. Reading the theories of Will Kymlicka and Charles Taylor as complementary rather than opposed, Group Rights as Human Rights sees group rights as anchored both in the value of cultural belonging for the development of individual autonomy and in each person's need for a recognition of her identity. This double foundation has important consequences for the scope of group rights: it highlights their potential not only in dealing with national minorities but also with immigrant groups; and it allows to determine how far such rights should also benefit illiberal groups. Participation, not intervention, should here be the guiding principle if group rights are to realize the liberal promise.
650		0	_aLAW.
650		0	_aPOLITICAL SCIENCE _xPHILOSOPHY.
650		0	_aLAW _xPHILOSOPHY.
650		0	_aPUBLIC LAW.
650	1	4	_aLAW.
650	2	4	_aLAW THEORY/LAW PHILOSOPHY.
650	2	4	_aPOLITICAL PHILOSOPHY.
650	2	4	_aPUBLIC LAW.
710	2		_aSpringerLink (Online service)
773	0		_tSpringer eBooks
776	0	8	_iPrinted edition: _z9781402042089
830		0	_aLaw and Philosophy Library, _x1572-4395 ; _v75
856	4	0	_uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-4209-4 _zVer el texto completo en las instalaciones del CICY
912			_aZDB-2-SHU
942			_2ddc _cER
999			_c36704 _d36704