02878nam a22004935i 4500001001800000003000900018005001700027007001500044008004100059020001800100020001900118024003500137082001400172100002800186245012900214264004600343300003400389336002600423337002600449338003600475347002400511490004900535520119300584650000901777650002301786650002101809650001601830650002301846650000901869650003101878650003101909650001601940650002301956650002301979710003402002773002002036776003602056830004902092856010102141912001402242942001202256999001702268952009902285978-1-4020-6256-8DE-He21320260521092135.0cr nn 008mamaa100301s2007    ne |    s    |||| 0|eng d  a9781402062568  a997814020625687 a10.1007/978-1-4020-6256-82doi04a340.12231 aCoskun, Deniz.eeditor.10aLaw As Symbolic Formh[electronic resource] :bErnst Cassirer and the Anthropocentric View of Law /cedited by Deniz Coskun. 1aDordrecht :bSpringer Netherlands,c2007.  aXII, 381 p.bonline resource.  atextbtxt2rdacontent  acomputerbc2rdamedia  aonline resourcebcr2rdacarrier  atext filebPDF2rda1 aLaw and Philosophy Library,x1572-4395 ;v82  aJurisprudence, according to Cassirer, is not merely the systematic, conceptual pursuance of ethics. They are separate domains for Cassirer, and both direct their claims differently on the individual. Whereas ethics concerns the motives of the individual, law ultimately achieves a cosmos for our world of outward actions. However, they are not separated by a neutral line or a vacuum. For law to have effect as a symbolic form it is necessary that it reflects the law in the mind of people i.e., that one could and ought to have assented to it out of ethical principles and maxims. The conceptual analysis of law goes hand to hand with its genetic account. Both ethics and law are products of, spring forth from the formative or symbolic powers of man, and although, as any other symbolism, they might confront us as something objective, i.e., as part of reality that is beyond our immediate reach, ultimately we must always bring them to account to their very source: our independent and individual moral judgment. In this book we describe the rule of law as the reign of persuasion rather than the reign of force, and democracy as the reign by persuasion rather than the reign by force. 0aLAW. 0aPHILOSOPHY OF LAW. 0aLAWxPHILOSOPHY. 0aHUMANITIES. 0aPOLITICAL SCIENCE.14aLAW.24aLAW THEORY/LAW PHILOSOPHY.24aINTERDISCIPLINARY STUDIES.24aPHILOSOPHY.24aPHILOSOPHY OF LAW.24aPOLITICAL SCIENCE.2 aSpringerLink (Online service)0 tSpringer eBooks08iPrinted edition:z9781402062551 0aLaw and Philosophy Library,x1572-4395 ;v8240uhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6256-8zVer el texto completo en las instalaciones del CICY  aZDB-2-SHU  2ddccER  c37566d37566  00102ddc40708LEaCICYbCICYcELd2025-10-06l0o340.1r2025-10-06 08:45:31w2025-10-06yER