<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>04469nam a22004935i 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="001">978-0-387-78707-7</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="003">DE-He213</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260521092007.0</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="007">cr nn 008mamaa</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="008">110413s2009    xxu|    s    |||| 0|eng d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">9780387787077</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="020" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">99780387787077</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="024" ind1="7" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">10.1007/978-0-387-78707-7</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">doi</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="082" ind1="0" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">336</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">23</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="100" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Falaschetti, Dino.</subfield>
    <subfield code="e">author.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Democratic Governance and Economic Performance</subfield>
    <subfield code="h">[electronic resource] :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">How Accountability Can Go Too Far in Politics, Law, and Business /</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">by Dino Falaschetti.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="264" ind1=" " ind2="1">
    <subfield code="a">New York, NY :</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">Springer New York,</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">2009.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="300" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">XXI, 131 p.</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">online resource.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="336" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">text</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">txt</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdacontent</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="337" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">computer</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">c</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdamedia</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="338" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">online resource</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">cr</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rdacarrier</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="347" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">text file</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">PDF</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">rda</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1="1" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Studies in Public Choice,</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0924-4700 ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">14</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="505" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">A General Theory and Statistical Evidence -- Theory -- Natural Experiments -- Statistical Evidence -- Implications for Political Bureaucracy, Competition Law, and Business Organization -- Politics -- Law -- Business -- Conclusion.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Conventional wisdom warns that unaccountable political and business agents can enrich a few at the expense of many. But logically extending this wisdom implies that associated principals - voters, consumers, shareholders - will favor themselves over the greater good when 'rules of the game' instead create too much accountability. Democratic Governance and Economic Performance rigorously develops this hypothesis, and finds statistical evidence and case study illustrations that democratic institutions at various governance levels (e.g., federal, state, corporation) have facilitated opportunistic gains for electoral, consumer, and shareholder principals. To be sure, this conclusion does not dismiss the potential for democratic governance to productively reduce agency costs. Rather, it suggests that policy makers, lawyers, and managers can improve governance by weighing the agency benefits of increased accountability against the distributional costs of favoring principal stakeholders over more general economic opportunities. Carefully considering the fundamentals that give rise to this tradeoff should interest students and scholars working at the intersection of social science and the law, and can help professionals improve their own performance in policy, legal, and business settings. Falaschetti skillfully synthesizes key ideas from social choice theory, organizational economics, and interest group politics to challenge conventional wisdom about the benefits of democratic governance in organizations. This is an important book for reforming how financial institutions are regulated, and corporations are governed, in the wake of the great financial market collapse of 2008. (Margaret Blair, Vanderbilt Law) The scope of Democratic Governance and Economic Performance is truly commendable. While legal scholars, economists, and political scientists have raised parts of these issues before, by addressing the topic from both theoretical and empirical levels, this book provides useful perspective to anyone interested in the relationship between governance institutions and firm performance. (Jon Klick, Penn Law) This insightful book shares with Madison's "Federalist #10" a concern for potentially disruptive effects from "majority factions." Falaschetti reminds us that some of our most costly policies result from democratic responsiveness, while some of our most successful policies come from organizations (e.g. courts, the Fed) that insulate us from democratic pressures. (Gary Miller, Washington University, Political Science)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">ECONOMICS.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">FINANCE.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">COMMERCIAL LAW.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">BUSINESS PLANNING.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">ECONOMICS/MANAGEMENT SCIENCE.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="2" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">PUBLIC FINANCE &amp; ECONOMICS.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="2" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">POLITICAL SCIENCE.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="2" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">LAW AND ECONOMICS.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="2" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">ORGANIZATION/PLANNING.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="710" ind1="2" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">SpringerLink (Online service)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="773" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="t">Springer eBooks</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="776" ind1="0" ind2="8">
    <subfield code="i">Printed edition:</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">9780387787060</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="830" ind1=" " ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Studies in Public Choice,</subfield>
    <subfield code="x">0924-4700 ;</subfield>
    <subfield code="v">14</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="u">http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-78707-7</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">Ver el texto completo en las instalaciones del CICY</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="912" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">ZDB-2-SBE</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">ER</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">35036</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">35036</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">ddc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="8">LE</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">CICY</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">CICY</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">EL</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2025-10-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">336</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2025-10-06 08:44:19</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2025-10-06</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">ER</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
