<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02286nam a2200277Ia 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">MX-MdCICY</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260521091714.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">CICY</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">B-19842</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Transcriptomic and metabolomic profiling of Camellia oleifera seedling roots treated with different nitrogen forms</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="v">Plant Growth Regulation, https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-022-00896-9, 2022</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Nitrogen (N)is an essential nutrient for plant growth, but its availability is limited in the soil of subtropical ecosystems. Identifying the genes responsible for N utilization efficiency (NUE)in Camellia oleifera is important because of the excessive cost of N fertilization. To investigate this, we performed RNA-sequencing of C. oleifera roots to reveal the genome-wide gene expression in response to three synthetic forms of N, namely ammonium (NH?+?4), nitrate (NO- 3), and ammonium nitrate (NH4NO3), provided to three independent groups of plants. The expression of several ammonium and nitrate transporters increased slightly in the NO- 3-treated group and significant changes were observed in the NH?+?4- and NH4NO3-treated groups. The opposite expressions of some key N transport and assimilation genes under the different N treatments suggested that C. oleifera might have different N utilization pathways for the different N forma. Additionally, the genes involved in N transport and assimilation account for the different N uptake and for different concentrations of glutamate and glutamine in plants and the metabolomic data showed that the accumulation of both amino-acids was promoted by the NH?+?4 and NH4NO3 treatments but not by the NO- 3 treatment. These findings will help improve the NUE of C. oleifera and guide its agricultural production in the future.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">TEA OIL CAMELLIA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">METABOLOME</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">TRANSCRIPTOME</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">NITROGEN FORMS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">TRANSPORTERS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Zhou, J.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Liu, Y.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Chen, M.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Tan, X.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Yuan, J.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="u">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hPqz9TL7o8qH-wISKEu0mFuizIYOuYfZ/view?usp=drivesdk</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">Para ver el documento ingresa a Google con tu cuenta: @cicy.edu.mx</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">Loc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">REF1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">250602s9999    xx |||||s2   |||| ||und|d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">29897</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">29897</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">Loc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="8">F1</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">CICY</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">CICY</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">RE</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2025-06-25</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">B-19842</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2025-06-25 16:24:38</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2025-06-25</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">REF1</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
