<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02211nam a2200265Ia 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">MX-MdCICY</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260521091650.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">CICY</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">B-19090</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">The impact of MWCNT modification on the structural performance of polymeric composite profiles</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="v">Polymer Bulletin, 77(12), p.6563-6576, 2020</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">The significant advantages of nanoparticles have motivated engineers to focus on development of structural integrity by use of these materials. This paper presents a comprehensive experimental study on the impact of nanomodification in laminated composite structures. The influence of nanomaterials on the mechanical performance is examined through the assessment of "residual stress," "weight loss under thermal fatigue" and "delamination damage in machining operations" of glass fiber-reinforced polymer (GFRP)composites. In this case, different composite specimens were fabricated with 0 percent and 1 percent weight fraction of multi-walled carbon nanotubes (MWCNTs). Then, the slitting method as an accurate semi-destructive technique was performed to measure the non-uniform residual stresses in terms of MWCNTs content. Also, the role of MWCNTs in the weight loss of the specimens with different thicknesses under thermal fatigue was analyzed. Additionally, the rotary ultrasonic drilling technique as a high-tech drilling operation was carried out and delamination damage of the GFRPs under machining process was measured. The results indicated that the addition of 1 percent MWCNTs results in a decrease of 30 percent and 2.33 percent in residual stress and delamination states, respectively.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">GLASS FIBER-REINFORCED POLYMER (GFRP)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">MULTI-WALLED CARBON NANOTUBES</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">(MWCNTS)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">RESIDUAL STRESS MEASUREMENT</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">WEIGHT LOSS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">DELAMINATION</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">EXPERIMENTAL TEST</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Tabatabaeian, A.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Ghasemi, A. R.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="u">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1PcEakA-T5QMf5a1FCZ0ptFKHjGCjPEIi/view?usp=drivesdk</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">Para ver el documento ingresa a Google con tu cuenta: @cicy.edu.mx</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">Loc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">REF1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">250602s9999    xx |||||s2   |||| ||und|d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">29169</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">29169</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">Loc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="8">F1</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">CICY</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">CICY</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">RE</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2025-06-25</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">B-19090</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2025-06-25 16:24:24</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2025-06-25</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">REF1</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
