<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02704nam a2200265Ia 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">MX-MdCICY</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260521091643.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">CICY</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">B-18850</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Possible use of biosolids in fired-clay bricks</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="v">Construction and Building Materials,  91, p.86-93, 2015</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">In Australia, thousands of tonnes of biosolids are produced annually and millions of dollars expended on their management. Biosolids are derived from wastewater sludge, which is the major solid component collected from the wastewater treatment process. This paper presents some of the results from a study concerning the use of biosolids in fired-clay bricks. The geotechnical characteristics of three biosolids samples from the stockpiles of the Eastern Treatment Plant (ETP)in Melbourne were investigated to assess their suitability as a partial replacement material for the clay in fired-clay bricks. The results of classification tests including liquid limit, plastic limit and sieve analysis indicated that the three biosolids samples were clayey sand and poorly graded silty sand. The linear shrinkage of the biosolids samples varied from 10 percent to 15 percent and the organic content varied from 6 percent to 14 percent. Control clay bricks with 0 percent biosolids and clay-biosolids bricks with 25 percent by weight of biosolids were made and the properties including the compressive strength, shrinkage, density, Initial Rate of Absorption (IRA), and water absorption were determined whereas thermal conductivity was estimated from an empirical model. Furthermore, the effect of adding biosolids on the microstructure of the fired-clay bricks was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results showed that the compressive strength of clay-biosolids bricks were 25.9, 17.4 and 16.2 MPa for the bricks with the three different biosolids samples used in the study. This was mainly because of the addition of biosolids samples with different organic content, which resulted in fired-bricks with higher apparent porosity and thus lower density and compressive strength. The compressive strength of the control fired-clay bricks was 36.1 MPa.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">BIOSOLIDS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">FIRED-CLAY BRICKS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">RECYCLING</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">BUILDING MATERIALS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Ukwatta, A.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Mohajerani, A.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Setunge, S.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Eshtiaghi, N.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="u">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1KDPFFmxLmaRMosGJ_Pfk4VZTzAFrjfAG/view?usp=drivesdk</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">Para ver el documento ingresa a Google con tu cuenta: @cicy.edu.mx</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">Loc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">REF1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">250602s9999    xx |||||s2   |||| ||und|d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">28933</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">28933</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">Loc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="8">F1</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">CICY</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">CICY</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">RE</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2025-06-25</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">B-18850</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2025-06-25 16:24:20</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2025-06-25</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">REF1</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
