<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02142nam a2200217Ia 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">MX-MdCICY</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260521091529.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">CICY</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">B-16537</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Evaluation of Transient Electromagnetic Soundings for Deep Detection of Conductive Fluids</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="v">Groundwater, 24(3), p.351-356, 1986</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">Transient electromagnetic sounding methods (TEM)have several advantages over DC resistivity soundings. The principal advantage is that sounding depths several times the receiver-transmitter spacing can be achieved, resulting in less cumbersome field work and more flexible sounding site selection. The TEM method was tested using a commercially available instrument (Geonics EM-37)in the Gulf Springs region of west-central Florida to locate the saltwater interface in the Floridan Aquifer. The Floridan is a thick (200 m), unconfined, karstic, carbonate aquifer within the study area. High annual rainfall and internal drainage create a deep and dynamic interface. Eighty transient soundings were completed in 18 field days. Seventy-one soundings used a square 80 m &#xD7; 80 m transmitter loop, and the other nine used a 160 m &#xD7; 160 m coil. The interface was easily detected from a minimum depth of 60 m to its maximum depth of about 140 meters. Also, a high-resistivity, low-porosity zone was detected at depths ranging from 180-250 meters. The TEM data compare well with available chloride concentration data. The TEM interface corresponds to chloride values in excess of 200-400 mg/1. The sounding curves obtained suggest that with presently available instruments the TEM method is not well-suited for shallow soundings (less than 40-50 meters). Copyright &#xA9; 1986, Wiley Blackwell. All rights reserved</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">AQUIFERS - FLORIDA</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">DATA PROCESSING - DATA ACQUISITION</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">HYDROLOGY</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Stewart, M.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Gay, M.C.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="u">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1h9iwdaRAT9V2QEulUjMQuKRM1gOokfKz/view?usp=drivesdk</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">Para ver el documento ingresa a Google con tu cuenta: @cicy.edu.mx</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">Loc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">REF1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">250602s9999    xx |||||s2   |||| ||und|d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">26646</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">26646</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">Loc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="8">F1</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">CICY</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">CICY</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">RE</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2025-06-25</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">B-16537</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2025-06-25 16:01:53</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2025-06-25</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">REF1</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
