<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<record
    xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
    xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim http://www.loc.gov/standards/marcxml/schema/MARC21slim.xsd"
    xmlns="http://www.loc.gov/MARC21/slim">

  <leader>02167nam a2200253Ia 4500</leader>
  <controlfield tag="003">MX-MdCICY</controlfield>
  <controlfield tag="005">20260521091312.0</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="040" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">CICY</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="090" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">B-12295</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="245" ind1="1" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="a">Analysis of cracked magnetoelectroelastic composites under time-harmonic loading</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="490" ind1="0" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="v">International Journal of Solids and Structures, 47(1), p.71-80, 2010</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="520" ind1="3" ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="a">This paper presents a numerical model for the analysis of cracked magnetoelectroelastic materials subjected to in-plane mechanical, electric and magnetic dynamic time-harmonic loading. A traction boundary integral equation formulation is applied to solve the problem in combination with recently obtained time-harmonic Green's functions (Rojas-Diaz et al., 2008). The hypersingular boundary integral equations appearing in the formulation are first regularized via a simple change of variables that permits to isolate the singularities. Relevant fracture parameters, namely stress intensity factors, electric displacement intensity factor and magnetic induction intensity factor are directly evaluated as functions of the computed nodal opening displacements and the electric and magnetic potentials jumps across the crack faces. The method is checked by comparing numerical results against existing solutions for piezoelectric solids. Finally, numerical results for scattering of plane waves in a magnetoelectroelastic material by different crack configurations are presented for the first time. The obtained results are analyzed to evaluate the dependence of the fracture parameters on the coupled magnetoelectromechanical load, the crack geometry and the characteristics of the incident wave motion.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">CRACK</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">MAGNETOELECTROELASTIC MATERIALS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">WAVE SCATTERING</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">DYNAMICS</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="650" ind1="1" ind2="4">
    <subfield code="a">BOUNDARY ELEMENT METHOD (BEM)</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Rojas-D&#xED;az, R.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">Garc&#xED;a-S&#xE1;nchez, F.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="700" ind1="1" ind2="2">
    <subfield code="a">S&#xE1;ez, A.</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="856" ind1="4" ind2="0">
    <subfield code="u">https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JmE86Gh3AO3vIYdlLKBQBF9C9bKYCqBL/view?usp=drivesdk</subfield>
    <subfield code="z">Para ver el documento ingresa a Google con tu cuenta: @cicy.edu.mx</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="942" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="2">Loc</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">REF1</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <controlfield tag="008">250602s9999    xx |||||s2   |||| ||und|d</controlfield>
  <datafield tag="999" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="c">22444</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">22444</subfield>
  </datafield>
  <datafield tag="952" ind1=" " ind2=" ">
    <subfield code="0">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="1">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="2">Loc</subfield>
    <subfield code="4">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="7">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="8">F1</subfield>
    <subfield code="a">CICY</subfield>
    <subfield code="b">CICY</subfield>
    <subfield code="c">RE</subfield>
    <subfield code="d">2025-06-25</subfield>
    <subfield code="l">0</subfield>
    <subfield code="o">B-12295</subfield>
    <subfield code="r">2025-06-25 15:38:50</subfield>
    <subfield code="w">2025-06-25</subfield>
    <subfield code="y">REF1</subfield>
  </datafield>
</record>
